13 May 2025 · 1 min read
Last week at the AI in Clinical Development Summit 2025 in NYC, I had the pleasure of joining an...
Last week at the AI in Clinical Development Summit 2025 in NYC, I joined a panel tackling the timeless build-or-buy question for pharma AI in clinical development. Our consensus: a "build with" strategy — co-developing with selected strategic AI startup partners — strikes the right balance between speed, fit, and long-term value.
Author
Last updated
6 May 2026
Last week at the AI in Clinical Development Summit 2025 in NYC, I had the pleasure of joining an amazing panel with Sara Hughes (GSK), Rob Saiter (Accenture), and my former colleague Gabriel Eichler, moderated by Adam Petrich, MD from QuantHealth.
We tackled a timeless question: Build or buy?
Specifically - how should pharma approach AI innovation in clinical development?
Three takeaways from our discussion:
-
Pharma has rich in-house data assets, but much of it remains siloed or unstructured, limiting its value for AI, if you are unwilling to invest in it; and external data sets are often purchased as one-offs for specific project and not leveraged strategically
-
Internal development teams most often can't move at the pace of startups due to scale and complexity
-
Off-the-shelf AI tools rarely succeed if they don't integrate seamlessly into clinical workflows
The consensus? A "build with" strategy, co-developing with selected strategic AI startup partners, strikes the right balance between speed, fit, and long-term value.
Thanks to everyone who joined us for the fantastic event, and to QuantHealth for hosting!